Action Plan in response to the QAA Higher Education...
8 downloads
109 Views
65KB Size
Action Plan in response to the QAA Higher Education Review of EIC HER Report – point identified Good Practice The effectiveness of the critical thinking strand within the pre-master's ILSC programme, providing excellent preparation for postgraduate students in business management (para 2.28) (B3) Action Plan Undergo a periodic review to monitor the quality and standards of the
Action
Target date
Lead Success responsibility indicator/evaluation
Oversight and Governance
A.1 Share best practice via the ILSC forum across the network of Study Skills teachers
Dec 2016
MASS
S.1 Regular reports on student outcomes to demonstrate high levels of success S.2 Exchange and dissemination of teaching practice is strongly in evidence through cross College/University/Navitas boards and committees S.3 Positive outcomes outlined in observation of teaching reports
AAC - Regular reports to Academic Advisory Committee and through the Navitas Quality and Standards Office
S.4 Navitas will schedule a Periodic Review with representation from another Navitas College, an independent external
AMP - The Annual Monitoring Process will be informed of this activity.
A.2 Undergo a Periodic Review
Dec 2016
Navitas DSEAQ
AMP - The Annual Monitoring Process will be informed of these activities. EIC Annual Report will provide data on the student outcomes
programmes offered by EIC.
The effective use of tracer data in reviewing existing curricula, which enhances student learning opportunities.
A.3 Annual Monitoring of Programme and associated reports demonstrate thorough consideration of module and programme performance with clear actions, targets and goals identified
Annually CDP MASS DMR
Continue to support the growth of international students at the University (2.15)
A.4 Continue to work with the Edinburgh Napier University International Office to align marketing activities to support student growth
Ongoing
DMR
and a representative from Edinburgh Napier University S.5 EIC will undertake a review of programmes and action any conditions or recommendations arising from the Periodic Review. S.6 Tracer data will track students' performance as they progress through the University and compare EIC students with those directly recruited to the University
AAC - report to Academic Advisory Committee and through the Navitas Quality and Standards Office
S.7 Increase in student numbers S.8 Increase in student satisfaction ratings
MRAC -Regular reports to Marketing and Recruitment Advisory Committee and through the Navitas Community of Excellence
JSPMB – report to Joint Strategic Partnership Management Board AMP - The Annual Monitoring Process will be informed of these activities. AAC -Regular reports to Academic Advisory Committee and through the Navitas Quality and Standards Office
AMP - The Annual Monitoring Process will be informed of these activities.
Develop further the EIC Good Scholarship Policy and the Academic Merit Recognition Policy for both academic merit and academic engagement (para 4.2)
A.5 Further develop the Independent Learning Charter through consultation with staff and students
Dec 2016
MASS SSO
S.9 Increased student satisfaction and engagement activities
EIC Annual Report. CET – Reported and discussed at the College Enhancement Team.